Showing posts with label john edwards affair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label john edwards affair. Show all posts

Saturday, August 16, 2008

John Edwards Affair; Edwards, Rielle Hunter, Rush Limbaugh and Assumptions

"Assumptions are sometimes useful, sometimes worthless. Assumptions based on someone's lies should be labeled, 'ABOSL'."
--DBKP's Guide to the Aspiring Writer





We always read the comments to stories here at DBKP. In fact, one of our mantras is, "The comments are part of the story".

Another is, "Sometimes, the comments are better than the story".

One comment alerted us to a story, Is Rush Limbaugh Reille Hunter´s Sugar Daddy?, written by Dee, at Immigration Talk with a Mexican American. Dee is anything if not economical: she shoehorns a lot into her story.

Think of Edwards story. The timeline! He is convinced it is NOT his baby because his last quickie with her was in April. She is not impregnated until late May. His ego does not allow him to consider IVF.


We mention this because it points out a danger that all writers--DBKP included--face; i.e., of basing assumptions on a public figure's lies. The lies are found out and POOF!, there goes all your theories.

In the John Edwards scandal, the biggest two assumptions were made by the Mainstream Media and plague them today as they struggle to explain to their readers why they didn't trust them with information on this story before August 8.

The first: that John Edwards told the truth. The second assumption was that because the National Enquirer reported the information, it couldn't be trusted, not even enough for them to do their own investigations, prior to late July.

As we point out in our soon-to-be published writer's guidelines: Assumptions are sometimes useful, sometimes worthless. Assumptions based on someone's lies should be labeled, 'ABOSL'.

NOW, we're not picking on Dee: we're sure that after you read her story, you'll come to the conclusion that she's got her tongue in her cheek. She seems so pleasant in her comments to DBKP's stories, we're sure of it.

One item did strike us, Dee's quote that, "The odds of a first time pregnancy after 40 are astronomical."

From Older mothers - facts and figures:

Additionally, there is an almost 50% increase from ten years ago in the number of women over forty who are now having babies. The rate for women aged 40 and over increased fastest, by over six per cent from 11.5 per 1,000 women aged 40-44 in 2005, to 12.2 in 2006.

The number of live births in England and Wales to mothers aged 40 plus was 12,103 in 1996 and 23,706 in 2006.


Again, here's more info from the United Kingdom. From
Parenting: Age Of First Time Mothers Shows A Sharp Increase
:

The number of women having children in their 30s and 40s has climbed steadily over the last 20 years at a time when the overall birth rate has been dropping, in 2003, the fertility rate for women aged 35-39 and over 40 both increased almost 8%.

Later pregnancies are particularly evident among the wealthier social classes, where women persue a career before embarking on motherhood. The only draw back to later parenting is that as a woman gets older their fertility declines.


We realize that the data's from the U.K., not the USA. And there's precious little data about the pregnancy rates of mistresses over 40, but perhaps this might make a good project for some enterprising blogger.

The poster pictured at the beginning of this story? It's not there exclusively in reference to Dee or the Mainstream Media.

It hangs on the side of a computer at DBKP.

by Mondoreb
image: wsmonty

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

John Edwards Love Child Sex Scandal: Hunter Living the "Life of Rielle"

Hunter becomes the Hunted




DNA Sample Would Clear Things Up in a Hurry For Edwards

"He's Pro-Abortion, So What's the Problem?"

Testing the Theory: There is no such thing as Bad Publicity

The Enquirer Pulls the Story from its Website sometime between 3 and 6 am.

So, Is This Whole Love Child Sex Scandal Thing Still On or What?

The Way They Run the Enquirer: It's a Scandal!!


John Edwards is expected to again deny reports that he's the father of a love child by a former campaign worker.

The allegations resurfaced after the National Enquirer announced it now has photos of a visibly pregnant Rielle Hunter.

Hunter, at one point known as Lisa Druck, is saying that another member of the Edwards' campaign is the father.

But then, Rielle or Lisa, told the National Enquirer, when she answered the door, that she was neither.

If the Enquirer's revelations are true, Reille Hunter at one point was known as Lisa Druck and John Edwards at one point was known as a candidate.


6:15 am EST: Chuck Calls Us "Morons"; National Enquirer Story is Now Down!



2007
Proud Winner's of
"Chuck's Morons"

"Thank you, thank you!"
"You’d think that these so called professional Bloggers would know this!

(I notice the original story on the Enquirer has disappeared and good for them for pulling it!Applause)

Bunch of damn morons….

Morons are: DBKP, The Radio Equalizer and Macsmind"

--Chuck Adkins: Memo to Bloggers about the National Enquirer's John Edwards' story: Get Real, Please!


And we like Chuck like our kin, too...

Who exactly was it that called us professional Bloggers?

I think you have to have a license. We don't want to get in any trouble, just for the record.

Curiously, Chuck's the 2nd blog that's written of the National Enquirer pulling down the story. At the first one that reported that (we left a comment informing them our links worked just fine at a little after 3:00 am EST) the Enquirer pulled the story down, we had to sadly report: it's still up.

BUT, after testing it for this story, Chuck is right! The story is down!

So at shortly after 3:00, the Enquirer story was up.
At shortly after 6:00, the Enquirer story is down.

Hmmm....

Why'd the Enquirer take the story down? At least one inquiring mind wants to know.

Well, whether it is up or down, we stand by our story which is: we read the Enquirer.

And also, Meme orandum...where the story is still up proudly at the top while we type at 6:15.

But whether we're proved right or wrong, we're proud to win any award Chuckie's handing out.

Do we get to give a speech?

We need to fix our hair.



6:30 am EST: Rielle Hunter Still Pregnant; We Still Have Chuck's Trophy
Edwards and Hunter both denied the affair. For weeks the story went dormant and Edwards told the New York Daily News, "The story disappeared because it's made up." According to the report from Rush and Molloy, The magazine stood by its original story claiming that it was 100% accurate.

The story of Edwards and Hunter have been surfacing over the last couple months, with the National Enquirer going so far as to accuse Edwards in October.

It then was supposed to email proof to Edwards. The Enquirer didn't and the scandal simmered down.

Apparently, the National Enquirer had just begun to fight.

NOW, it has photos of Rielle in the family way, and statements from multiple sources that name Edwards as the father.

Of course, the Edwards' campaign will issue heated denials.

Who to believe?

Well, the Enquirer's reputation for the unvarnished truth isn't as high as it might be.

But neither is Edwards'.

He's previously insisted that he took a high-paying position to study "poverty".

One way to settle the controversy would be for Edwards to come forward and offer DNA. If he's not the father, the case is closed, and being the fine trial lawyer that he is, he may have some recourse against the National Enquirer.

From all indications and circumstances, here's a prediction: he will state the allegations are beneath his squashing them with a medical test. He will deny, and people will choose who to believe.

Of course, none of the resulting controversy and negative buzz will help him get the press to pay any attention to his issues.

But that might be a good thing. On the day the scandal erupted again, some polls reported that John Edwards had taken a slight lead in Iowa.

So maybe he won't have any grounds for damages against the National Enquirer, right or wrong.

One thing's for sure: in another three months or so, Ms. Hunter will deliver a bouncing bundle of joy into this world.

If it has Edwards' hair, people will talk.


* John Edwards Shared More Than Shampoo With Rielle Hunter

* John Edwards, Rielle Hunter Love Child Sex Scandal: Who is Rielle Hunter?

* Edwards Alleged Love Child Sex Scandal: Clintons Orchestrated Rumor?

[NOTE: Even if Edwards turns out to be the father, we're keeping the cool trophy.]

by Mondoreb
[image:nationalenquirer]
Source: John Edwards Love Child Sex Scandal: Rielle Hunter Named Again

Digg!

DBKP.com - Bigger, Better!.
Back to DBKP at Blogger Front Page