Since the deadly Christmas day tiger attack at the San Francisco Zoo, misconceptions, false rumors, and blaming the victims are being replaced by cold, hard facts.
From the AP:
When questioned by reporters, Mollinedo gave an inaccurate figure for the wall's height, putting it at 18 feet. Then, two days after the attack, he acknowledged the wall was only 12½ feet – or 4 feet below the recommended national standard.Instead of calling into the question of the height of the wall, Mollinedo insinuated that the three victims, 17-year-old Carlos Sousa Jr., and his friends, brothers Kulbir Dhaliwal, 23, and Paul Dhaliwal, 19, were "somehow" responsible:
At a news conference, Mollinedo suggested “something happened to provoke that tiger to leap out of her exhibit.”To bolster the "blame the victims' strategy, the zoo's newly hired crisis-management specialist, Sam Singer, admitted to furthering a highly inflammatory false rumor, that slingshots had been found. On Tuesday, Singer stated he was just "passing along" the slingshot story.
A police spokesman told The Associated Press last week that investigators quickly dismissed the slingshot allegation as inaccurate.The zoo's claim that "something had to have happened" to "make the tiger" climb or jump over its enclosure was bolstered by a report in the San Francisco Chronicle. A woman read of the tiger attack the next day and contacted the Chronicle.
Mark Geragos, the lawyer for the mauled survivors of the tiger attack, lambasted Singer's tactics as “an abomination” and threatened to sue for defamation.
“To be attacked by a tiger, number one, then to be attacked viciously by false and defamatory stuff is too much,” Geragos said.
In a San Francisco Chronicle article, zoo patron Jennifer Miller reported that she, her husband and children saw four young men at the big cat grottos and that three of the men were teasing the lions. Ms. Miller said that she called the zoo to report the obvious "taunting.""The boys, especially the older one, were roaring at them. He was taunting them," the San Francisco woman said. "They were trying to get that lion's attention. ... The lion was bristling, so I just said, 'Come on, let's get out of here' because my kids were disturbed by it.Miller called their behavior "disturbing."Her family was looking at the lions when the young men stopped beside them at the big-cat grottos - five outdoor exhibits attached to the Lion House. The young men started roaring at the lions and acting "boisterous" to get their attention, said Miller, who added that she watched the four for five minutes or so a little after 4 p.m.
"It was why we left," she said. "Their behavior was disturbing. They kept doing it." Source DBKP: Blaming the Victims
We wondered why, if this woman thought the behavior of the young men, so "disturbing", she didn't immediately report them to zoo officials, while still at the zoo.
The San Francisco Mayor, Gavin Newsom, has stuck by Mollinedo even though a zookeeper was attacked back in September by the same tiger.
According to a story by UPI on September 7, the zoo had reopened its tiger and lion exhibit after spending $250,000 in safety upgrades to the "dining hall" area. A zookeeper filed a lawsuit alleging that better security could have prevented an attack by a Siberian tiger back in December.The zoo is also under attack by animal rights activists who accuse Mollinedo of "putting entertainment" over the animal's well-being.
The tiger severely injured Lori Komejan when it managed to tear away the tendon tissue on her right arm. DBKP - Horror at San Francisco Zoo
“There just been a lack of respect for the animals to increase foot traffic,” Katz said. Mollinedo's crowd-pleasing initiatives, such as public feedings of big cats, have made them more aggressive, he said.
Warning Sign, SF Zoo, "Big Cat Feeding"
David Lee, another employee of the city of San Francisco, a recreation and parks commissioner, defended Mollinedo:
“The zoo is an old institution, very traditional, and some felt it hadn't changed much until Manuel came up,” Lee said. “He brought innovation, new ideas, and everyone benefited from that, people and animals.”And yet, something so simple as raising the walls on the tiger grotto another four feet might have kept one man and one tiger alive. Especially after the same tiger's past record of attacking a zookeeper just a few months earlier. Now the city will most likely face substantial civil lawsuits from the victims and their families.
Instead of owning up to the truth, that the walls were deficient, Mr. Mollinedo and his cronies chose to blame a now dead 17-year-old boy whose throat was slashed by the tiger. A Siberian tiger, doing what all tigers do, shot dead. Two young men left to deal with lasting memories of the final seconds of their friend's life at the hands of tiger, in a place that was supposed to be safe.
DBKP.com - Bigger, Better!.
Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.