Papercuts Poll Results: MSNBC Judged 'Most Unreliable MSM Organization

PAPERCUT POLL Results:
Which Mainstream Media Organization is Most Unreliable?

---

The results of DBKP's poll, "Which Mainstream Media Organization is Most Unreliable?" are in and we have a winner.

35% of respondents chose MSNBC as the most unreliable, biased MSM organization. Fox News was second with 27%.

THE RESULTS:

1. MSNBC - 35%
   
   
2. Fox News - 27%
   
   
3. New York Times - 18%
   
   
4. CNN - 7%
   
   
5. Los Angeles Times - 4%
   
   
6. CBS News - 2%
   
   
7. Washinton Post - 2%
   
   
8. Newsweek - 1%
   
   
9. TIME - 1%

The ran from November 11-30 2008 and 741 people participated.

DBKP's current poll question, "POLL: Which NFL Team Will Win Super Bowl XLIII" runs until November 8 2008.

Currently, the NY Giants lead with 26%, followed by the Dallas Cowboys, Pittsburgh Steelers and the Tennesee Titans.


by Mondo Frazier
image: dbkp file

POLL: Which NFL Team Will Win Super Bowl XLIII

POLL: Which NFL Team will win this year's (2009) Super Bowl?

December 1-8 2008

---

Which team will win the 2009 Super Bowl?

Depends on who you ask.

We'll provide the records of those who are possible to make the playoffs. Records after this week's games:

NFC

New York Giants - 11-1
Dallas Cowboys - 8-4
Washington Redskins - 7-5
Philadelphia Eagles - 6-5-1

Tampa Bay - 9-3
Carolina - 9-3
Atlanta - 8-4
New Orleans 6-6

Minnesota - 7-5
Chicago - 6-6
Green Bay - 5-7
Arizona - 7-5

AFC

New York Jets - 8-4
New England - 7-5
Miami 7-5
Buffalo 6-6

Tennessee 11-1
Indianapolis 8-4

Pittsburgh 9-3
Baltimore 8-4

Denver 7-5
San Diego 4-8

OTHER means all teams not listed; we provided a few to jog your memory.

---

Poll Opens: December 1 2008
Poll Closes: December 8 2008

---

The New York Giants are the defending champions and are favored to repeat in some quarters. Of course, being favored doesn't guarantee anything.

We'll publish the results of our poll (Nov 11-30) on media bias later today.


by Mondo
image: dbkp file

Papercuts Poll: Which MSM Organization is Most Unreliable?

POLL: Which Mainstream Media Organization is
The MOST Unreliable?

November 11-30 2008

---

With all of the true confessions now hitting the public about the off-kilter coverage of the election, we thought we'd ask a question.

Which "news" organization was the worst?

The Washington Post has already admitted that the paper's coverage heavily favored Barack Obama. Newsweek's editors then went on the record about their doubts about "media creation" Obama's "creepy" "cult of personality" supporters.

The LA Times--after trying out a variety of excuses--wouldn't release a video of Obama toasting former PLO spokesman Rashid Khalidi at a 2003 gala.

The NY Times has been silent, but that may be because the paper laid off its ombudsman in the latest round of lay-offs. We're only speculating.

TIME featured Obama on the cover more times over the last 42 weeks (10) than it did Princess Diana (eight) over her lifetime.

MSNBC's ratings are proof the network is not watched--and not to be taken seriously as a news source.

Pick a winner below. We'll announce the results after Thanksgiving in a few weeks.

---

"Which Mainstream Media (MSM) news organization was the most unreliable during the Election 2008?"



Poll opens November 11, 2008.
Poll closes November 30, 2008.

Posted by Mondo
image: dbkp file

DBKP National Internet Democrat Primary

Clinton or Obama?
Who should be the Nominee?
Vote Now!

Pick your town and username and who you favor: Clinton or Obama.
* No super-delegates allowed!
March 11-13 2008 for 48 hours.
Starting at 8:30 pm EDT on March 11 2008.
Ending at 8:30 pm EDT on March 13 2008.
Who should be the Democrat nominee?

[note: because of the errors in javascript, all voting will take place at below's link. Thanx.]
Vote at DBKP Democrat National Internet Primary

by Mondoreb
image: frappr

DBKP.com - Bigger, Better!.
Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.

Poll: Is the Country Populated by Kooks?

Click to enlarge picture

The NY Daily News is titled "Blame US for 911 Idiots in Majority". The story by Andy Soltis, reports Scripps-Howard/Ohio University poll results showing that "nearly two-thirds of Americans believe the federal government had warnings about 9/11 but decided to ignore them".

Some will shake their head in sad resignation, others in vigorous agreement with those particular figures. However, what is really interesting to those who fret about the U.S. becoming "Jerry Springer Nation" was at the end of the story.

In the latest Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll, 811 US adults were interviewed Sept. 24 to Oct. 10. Among the findings:

* 42 percent believe the federal government knew in advance of the plot to assassinate John F. Kennedy, compared with 40 percent who call that theory "not likely."

* 37 percent believe UFOs are real and that the feds have been hiding the truth about them.

The 2006 poll found 36 percent believed the government was also hiding proof that intelligent life exists on other planets.

* Eight out of 10 Americans suspect oil companies are conspiring to keep fuel prices high and 50 percent said a conspiracy is "very likely." Only 14 percent felt it was unlikely.

And some finding from the same poll in 2006.

In that (2006) poll, 16 percent said the Twin Towers might have collapsed because of secretly planted explosives - not hijacked passenger jets flown into them.

And what hit the Pentagon? Twelve percent figured it was a US cruise missile.

Anger at the federal government and skepticism in general by younger Americans is fueling the popularity of crackpot conspiracy theories.

Only 12 percent of Americans expressed anger at the government following the 2001 terrorist attack, but that grew steadily and reached 54 percent last year.

Most young adults give some credence to a conspiracy theory, while seniors are the least likely to believe in one, pollsters found.

Is the whole country populated by kooks?

These poll results might be used to illustrate almost any point one is trying to make: that U.S. education is failing miserably to teach students critical thinking skills; that video games are the ruination of the Republic; that lunacy loves company; that the system works; or, that the "truth" is getting out.

Soltis' point is a good one: anger and mistrust at the federal government has clouded the judgment of many Americans participating in polls.

Once, only Democrats had to worry about feeling the wrath of that mistrust.

Now Republicans, once the party of limited government and lassez faire are known for 'compassionate conservatism', and other fuzzy re-labeling of federal government expansion.

The frenzy of Republican-controlled Congressional earmarks further alienated conservative voters.

Any presidential candidate need only look at these poll results to see, come next November, which side to be on.

by Mondoreb
& Little Baby Ginn




Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.

Spiter Finding Voters Not So Easy to Bully

After trying to roll NY voters on drivers licenses for illegal immigrants, a new title may be in order.

New York's voters are finding out what many financial figures discovered long before now: when Eliot Spitzer wants something, he's not going to let niceties stand in his way.

And Eliot Spitzer is finding out that New York voters think much about his latest attempt to strong-arm those with differing opinions.

Voters my dump Eliot Spitzer because of his license love for illegals immigrants. From the AP:

Gov. Eliot Spitzer's plan to provide illegal immigrants with driver's licenses has sunk his favorability rating to an all-time low of 41 percent, and has left only 25 percent of voters planning to re-elect him, according to a poll the Siena Research Institute released Tuesday.

Forty-six percent had an unfavorable opinion of Spitzer, and 49 percent said they would "prefer someone else" as the next governor. Last month, 54 percent of voters had a favorable opinion of the governor.

"Eliot Spitzer's standing with voters has fallen faster and further than any politician in recent New York history," Siena spokesman Steven Greenberg said in a written statement. "Everything may not have changed on day one but from the voters' perspective, everything about Governor Spitzer changed in year one."

Spitzer swept to office last November with nearly 70 percent of the vote, carried largely by his reputation as a reformer and his campaign pledge to change everything starting on "Day One."

Spitzer certainly lived up to his billing about changing things. New Yorkers are only now finding out what his ideas for changing involved. If you were one of his earlier objects of attention in the financial world, you already knew.

The New York Times now reports that Spitzer is dropping his whole license plan--at least for now.

Eliot Spitzer is used to telling a compliant media his ideas about his targets. And if his targets resisted his ideas, he'd use threats and bullyboy tactics.

Now that same media is telling Spitzer the voters' idea. He's didn't like it when he met resistance on the license issue.

He'll find that voters are a little harder to bully.

by Mondoreb
[image: hprsite]



Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.