Showing posts with label seize. Show all posts
Showing posts with label seize. Show all posts

Saturday, February 9, 2008

Congress Moves to Seize Control of ALL Water



We would call it a "land grab", but it isn't that, exactly.

It's a power grab, a rights grab and a water grab.

Congress Moves To Seize Control Of All US Water From Bathtubs To Baptismal Fonts

Congress Moves To Give the Corps of Engineers Control Of All U.S. Waters


Now, some will say, "so what?"

Those would be the sheep in the crowd.

Thank God, their kind was in the minority 231 years ago.

And for many of those in Congress?

231 years ago, they would have been the agents of King George III.

From the American Land Rights Association:
Issue: Having been slapped down by the U. S. Supreme Court's recent decision that the words "navigable waters" in the Clean Water Act limited federal agencies to regulation of navigable waters only. Democrats and liberal Republicans in Congress are striking back.

They are attempting to pass the Clean Water Restoration Act of 2007 (HR2421 and S1870) that would amend the 1972 Clean Water Act and replace the words "navigable waters" with "waters of the United States."

Further, it defines "waters of the United States" with such breathtaking scope that federal agencies would be required to regulate use of every square inch of the U.S., both public and private.

The proposed definition states: "The term 'waters of the United States' means all waters subject to ebb and flow of the tides, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes [a flat dried up area, esp. a desert basin.] natural ponds and all impoundment of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution."

Obviously, those behind this legislation have only contempt for the Constitution, limited government and private property rights.

After the above explanation, a few relevant quotes followed, which we have reproduced below.
To understand what the framers of the Constitution intended, one need only look to their writings and the writings of those from whom they took wisdom and direction. A few of thousands of quotes follow:


"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If 'Thou shalt not covet' and 'Thou shalt not steal' were not commandments from Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made free."

- John Adams, A Defence of the Constitution of the United States against the Attacks of M. Turgot, 1787.

"What a man has honestly acquired is absolutely his own, which he may freely give, but cannot be taken from him without his consent."

- Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Circular Letter, 1768.

".'tis not without reason that [man] seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others who are already united, or have a mind to unite for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates which I call by the name of property."

- John Locke, Second Treatise of Government, 1690

"The property which every man has in his own labor, as it is the foundation of all other property, so it is the most sacred and inviolable."

- Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776

Another in the long line of continuing encircling tentacles of government and its regulations.

This time over water.

All water.

What's next? Air?

by Mondoreb
image: iowastormwater
Sources:
* Rense.com
* Land Rights Network
American Land Rights Association

Digg!

Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.

Thursday, November 15, 2007

FBI Surprise Raid Seizes 2 Tons of Ron Paul Dollars - UPDATE



UPDATES: Surprise FBI Raid Seizes 2 Tons of Ron Paul Dollars

Updates to our original story above. One from Italy where the writer makes a valid point. Not the one about George Bush being jealous: that's gratuitous Bush-bashing at its European finest.

The one about the FBI conducting the raid in the first place.
[NOTE: In the copy of the letter we saw from Liberty Coin, the Secret Service was involved in the raid also. However, this wasn't referenced in the following report.]
From URU Net, Italy:
"FBI Raids Liberty Dollar"
Webmaster's comment: Thet the FBI carried out this raid suggests a political motive. Maybe Goerge Bush was jealous because nobody wants to put his face on coins (just toilet paper). If the Liberty Dollar was really an illegal form of currency, the raid would have been carried out by the Treasury Department and Secret Service.
This from the Western Standard:
"L. Ron Paul Supporters Raided by FBI"
Why? Well, this company was minting coins and issuing paper notes claiming to be "dollars" and which, at least in the case of the coins, might easily have been taken by individuals for notes and coins issued by the Mint or the Federal Reserve.

Perhaps even more hillariously, given the intended market for these things, it appears that the minted gold, silver, and bronze coins were being told at markups of between 25% and 400% on the actual value of the precious metals contained therein. The only thing worse than a Goldbug is a stupid Goldbug and, apparently, these people were that in droves.

Now, Ron Paul's smarter supporters will attempt to distance themselves from such a disreputable operation. They can try and do that, of course - but, frankly, it will be difficult to with fifty pages of teeth gnashing from L. Ron's supporters about the raid. Moreover, any claim that Ron Paul didn't approve of or support this ought to be viewed skeptically in view of the fact that these people have been marketing these coins using his name and likeness since July at the very earliest.


More as they become available.
by Mondoreb
& Little Baby Ginn
[image: Libertydollars]

Digg!

Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.

Saturday, November 10, 2007

Breaking Non-Story:
"If Israel Withdraws From the West Bank, Hamas Will Seize it"



This just in: nature abhors a vaccuum. Film at 11.

No real news to write about? No problem.

If you're the creative type, you play a game of 'what if' and get someone to comment on it. The result: hot copy ready to serve up to readers.

That's a recipe used to put together the following story. Reporter A has to write about something, but instead starts day-dreaming. What if they put on a peace conference and something concrete came out of it. What if Israel would decide to withdraw from the West Bank? What if...well you get the story.

And so did Report A, who dug up a quote from a ranking Hamas official to comment on the scenario. There were no surpises: the Hamas leader said, in effect, "You leave, we move in". More of the usual in the Middle East from Yahoo News:
A top Hamas leader in the Gaza Strip warned on Friday that the Islamist movement would seize control of the West Bank if Israel withdrew from the occupied territory.

"Israel says the party in power in Ramallah (Fatah) serves its interests and if Israel withdraws from the West Bank, Hamas will take control. That's true," Mahmud Zahar told a party rally in Jabaliya, in the northern Gaza Strip.
Hamas wants land held by Israel? How can that be? The story continues

He called on Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas's Fatah party to "learn the lesson of what happened in Gaza" -- where nearly five months ago Hamas routed the moderate leader's loyalists and security officers in the coastal enclave.

Zahar also said an international meeting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that the United States is preparing to host later this month would fail.
Little Green Footballs has this to say about the peace conference-party crashers from Hamas:
Here’s an alternative opinion from Hamas on the upcoming Annapolis “peace conference” between Israel and the Fatah party, at which Israeli PM Olmert seems determined to make serious concessions on the issue of withdrawing settlements in the West Bank: Hamas says it will seize West Bank if Israel withdraws.

This was a story that had to written--on a slow news day. As a slow news day in the Middle East usually means a day without a bomb blast and death, so that's not a bad thing.

This story could have just as easily been filed under "science" with the headline, "Nature Abhors a Vaccuum".

by Mondoreb

[image:usaidmaps]

Digg!

Back to Front Page.