McCain Interview: McCain to Raise Obama-Ayers in Third Debate

Obama and His Bill Ayers Connection
McCain Interview: Doesn’t Give a Damn About Bill Ayers
Bob McCarty Writes

---

Mark Reardon, host of The Mark Reardon Show on St. Louis radio station KMOX-AM 1120, interviewed John McCain yesterday and got quite a statement out of the Republican Party presidential nominee regarding Barack Obama and his relationship with unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.

Asked whether he would make the relationship an issue during the third and final presidential debate at Hofstra University Wednesday evening, McCain virtually assured Reardon he would before explaining his reasoning:

"It's not that I give a damn about some old washed-up terrorist and his terrorist wife who in 2001 said they wished they had bombed more. What I care about — and what the American people care about — is whether he is being truthful with the American people."

It's a great interview. To listen to the entire interview, click here and then select "Mark Reardon (10/13/08) John McCain" from the podcast lineup on the right side of The Mark Reardon Show web site.

WANT More Bob McCarty, "The Ultimate Blogging Machine"? Try these recent posts: * Obama ‘Tax Calculator’ Attempts to Deceive Voters * Poll: Would You Trust Obamas With Your Children?

---

ALSO at DBKP:
* Obama, Bill Ayers: CNN Reports Obama-Ayers Connection Went Deeper
* Obama Addresses Relationship with Bill Ayers, former Weather Underground Terrorist, on Philadelphia Radio Talk Show
* Obama Video Shows Pattern Of Socialist Lingo, Socialist Ties
* Barack Obama, Bill Ayers: NY Times Continues to Whitewash Obama-Ayers Connection
* Obama, Bill Ayers, and FactCheck.Org: All Have Ties To Annenberg Foundation
* Obama, Bill Ayers: Mainstream Media Explain Away Obama Ties to Terrorists
* Obama, Bill Ayers: N. Vietnam Awarded Ayers Ring Made from Downed US Plane
* Bill Ayers, Obama: No Mainstream Media Interest in The Obama Bunch
* Obama, Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers: The ‘Tangential’ Bill Ayers
* Obama’s Ties to 1970’s Domestic Terrorist Bill Ayers: Disassociation and Little Condemnation

---

by Bob McCarty
image: dbkp file
Source: McCain Doesn't Give a Damn About Bill Ayers

The United Nations: A Creature of Fiction

"Personal Notice: Danger is my stock-in-trade. If the job is too tough for you to handle, you've got a job for me, George Valentine. Write full details."

The above advertisement was how the hero in 1940s radio thriller "Let George Do it" obtained his clients.

It made for great radio; it makes for lousy foreign policy. Besides, George was a fiction.

Increasingly, political leaders, from the Democrat Party to Greens in Germany, demand that a worldwide "George"--the United Nations--do the work whenever there's a problem.

Environmental problems? Nuclear Iran? The Internet?

"Let George (the U.N.) do it!"

An industry has sprung up castigating George Bush, the United States, Israel, Great Britain: in short any country who doesn't govern by committee, for the grave sin of "unilateralism".

The United Nations has a great track record for padding the pockets of its officials, naming Israel and the United States as a "problem" or "racist" and other amusing sideshow antics.

Its list of accomplishments of actually doing anything about serious problems is much shorter.

Now, there are some calls to let the United Nations police the Internet.

As commercials for risky investments proclaim, "Past performance is no guarantee of future success".

Calls for UN action are shorthand. Substitute the words, "Let George do it" and the results would be the same: nothing.

That anyone should "police" or "take charge" of the Internet is troubling--except to the nanny types who are troubled by nothing except smoking in bars, fatty foods and non-Politically Correct speech. That the United Nations do it is--well, we'll let the reader supply their own reaction.

With that in mind, the following five quotes may be enlightening. Remember them the next time someone gets in front of the cameras with a call for the U.N. to take action on anything, from Iraq to Iran's nuclear ambitions to policing the Internet.

"If I'm president, I will not only personally go to the UN, I will go to other capitals. . . . I will immediately reach out to other nations in a very different way from this administration. Within weeks of being inaugurated, I will return to the UN and I will literally, formally rejoin the community of nations and turn over a proud new chapter in America's relationship with the world."
--John Kerry, NBC's Meet the Press

"Should governance of the Internet be turned over to the United Nations? It seems far-fetched, but that’s exactly what some foreign governments – including China and the European Union – are advocating."

Three women peace activists interrupted today’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on John Bolton’s nomination as US Ambassador to the UN. They held up banners reading “NO Bolton, YES UN,” “Bolton = Nuclear Proliferation,” and “Diplomat, Not Bully, Please!” and urged Senators to reject Bolton as the worst possible choice for the job and for world peace.

"When everybody is responsible, nobody is"
--Arthur Rubenstein, among many

"Virtuous motives, trammelled by inertia and timidity, are no match for armed and resolute wickedness. A sincere love of peace is no excuse for muddling hundreds of millions of humble folk into total war. The cheers of weak, well-meaning assemblies soon cease to echo, and their votes soon cease to count. Doom marches on."
--Winston Churchill, writing in The Gathering Storm, of events in 1935. European powers, instead of acting against treaty violations and--in spite of bald declarations by Hitler and Mussolini on what they intended to do--kept insisting no one country but the League of Nations take action.

"Let George do it."

"Let the U.N. take action."

Both entities are fictitious.

In other words: let nobody do it.

by Mondoreb
[image:un]
Source: The Gathering Storm, Winston S. Churhill, p. 190
Let the U.N. Govern the Internet?
Kerry's UN Fetish



Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.

Savage Legal Nation Vs. C.A.I.R. Showdown

Michael Savage takes to the airwaves daily during his popular talk show "Savage Nation". Now, Savage will be taking it to the courts to stop copyright infringement against a familiar adversary.

Savage has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Council on Islamic-American Relations, and has accused the organization of being a "political vehicle of international terrorism" that seeks to do "material harm to those voices who speak against the violent agenda of CAIR's clients."

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in California, seeks damages equal to the ongoing donations from CAIR supporters "who expect CAIR to act in this manner in exchange for continuing financial support" as well as "actual damages according to proof."

Anyone familiar with CAIR knows that the organization is familiar witht the American legal system. CAIR has famously filed suits against bloggers who disagree with their views.

CAIR has yet to emerge victorious in the courts, but the legal expenses incurred by bloggers many times serve to dampen criticism of the Hamas-connected front group.

Now, CAIR is on the receiving end of a suit and it will be interesting to see if their uninspiring legal won-lost record is improved.

A spokesman for Savage indicated the top-rated talk show host would have no further comment, saying the text of the lawsuit itself would answer questions.

The focal point of the lawsuit is a series of audio clips CAIR has been using in its promotions and fundraising efforts.

There's no love lost between either Savage or CAIR.

"I'm not gonna put my wife in a hijab. And I'm not gonna put my daughter in a burqa. And I'm not getting' on my all-fours and braying to Mecca. And you could drop dead if you don't like it. You can shove it up your pipe. I don't wanna hear any more about Islam. I don't wanna hear one more word about Islam. Take your religion and shove it up your behind. I'm sick of you."

Savage vs. CAIR. If it was a TV special, it would acheive "must-see" status in many homes.

Savage is over-the-top and unabashed in his views, while CAIR is no less over-the-top, though somewhat more sly in expressing their views.

Michael Savage Vs. CAIR?

Ding ding ding!

by Mondoreb
& RidesAPaleHorse
[graphic:RAPH
Source:
World Net Daily Savage lawsuit calls CAIR 'vehicle of international terrorism'
FOR MORE: LGF: Savage Vs. CAIR



Death by 1000 Papercuts Front Page.